Does Invicta Suck?

Here is cat eating cake

f93657b8780c2a5ea5a49c5173bd5d22.jpg



Sent from my iPad and eavesdropped by the NSA using Tapatalk
 
I haven't heard such childish ramblings and claims of master of psychology since DaveCash 77 went off the rails for the second time and got asked to leave. Even Jim Skelton stopped and dumped or sold all his Invicta's. Also he got screwed over by Eyal on the Imperious line. Michael Davis got flushed by Invicta for all his hard work for them and Eyal showed his appreciation for the guys years of internet, forum work, and tv work for him by giving him the bums rush. With loyalty like that to people who helped him so much your'e right Eyal is the greatest kind of businessman to follow and worship and shamelessly promote. Call me out all day as I've never been a troll at a forum trying to stir a pot. I offer my opinions based on what I have learned, what I actually know and something you are lacking in most instances here. Facts. I don't bully a mod as they could take me out of here in a single stroke and I couldn't do a thing about it or would I try. You want to buzz in here and claim ridiculous stuff it's your right for you are the one looking like a fool(tool). I have no influence over anyone one. I'm an active member here who participates in all forms of the debates here. You come seeking something for some people who left here so maybe just go enjoy where your at(aholics) or come here and at like someone who wants to participate here in a civil manner. right now if you keep tripping over your feet it's because the clown shoes your wearing right now fit you to a T.
I kinda removed his posts because he insulted me by calling me a wimp. I guess he never saw me, lol. Oh look how cute that little kitty cat is! :lol:
 
An 8 page Invicta thread and I never chimed in. Perhaps because my complaints have been addressed (more or less) to the point that it just doesn't spin me up like it might have when they were at their apogee of shoveling used oats. Sometimes, perhaps rarely, it was the watch but more often it was about what the watch was claimed to be. Sometimes it was because somebody at WG broke containment and turned up at an uncensored watch site only to be sent home blowing snot bubbles.

Evine/SNBC/Invicta made claims based on the flawed assumption that nobody in their audience had an internet connection. Too many falsehoods to list and they've all been listed before.

But it's refreshing to see some of that old time religion manifest after the rest of the world has gone all "ho-hum" on a topic.



Now that's what I'm talking about! Some real passion for once. 14 posts in 3 years - if we'd have known that's what it took to get you out of your cocoon we'd have started ragging on Invicta earlier - but welcome. Participation is good - you should keep it up.

But I believe personal attacks are frowned on here and "pathetic" is dancing close to that line. They were ok at WG provided the person being attacked was a "hater" but you've drawn a flawed conclusion. The mods here are not wimps: they allow open discussion provided the facts are in line, opinions are stated reasonably and we don't put our heads through the drywall expressing them. Now, there may be some legitimate confusion - the mods at WG were, in some cases and at some times, reminiscent of the einsatzgruppen; closed threads, scrubbed threads, deleted posts, Orwellian over-moderation such that never an Invicta discouraging word was heard. Works well for soda commercials or Orwell novels but not so much at a discussion forum (it's pretty much the opposite of a discussion). In fact such an environment would suck out loud - and it did.

In view of this laudable prohibition on personal attacks I will note up front that I consider you to be a smart guy. But the post itself is reminiscent of a bad case of rectal-cranial inversion compounded by an intolerance of other views not seen since the Salem Witch trials. It does however provide a nice walk down memory lane for those that miss WG. Perhaps you could start your own forum - TOS to consist of: "Posts shall comport with my biases or else". It wouldn't be far off the WG TOS though mine is more succinct - theirs rambled on interminably but it amounted to the same thing.

So you're going lecture RW and CG on watches and attitudes pertaining thereto? Cool. 14 posts arrayed in battle formation against 30,000 made by two individuals who have in all likelihood forgotten more about horology than you could hope to learn unless you started hoovering up facts right this minute and continued learning through a hopefully long and prosperous life. (Hint: any facts about watches learned by watching TV are suspect and probably will require unlearning before your journey can commence) And you throw the mods under the bus while you're at it. Rich. One of the mods "liked" your post - see how civil people behave?

If we took Skelton, Davis, Lalo and, oh I don't know, Ryan and stirred them all together and fermented them for 5 years the resulting creation couldn't get away with posting the stuff you have without somebody responding. And probably making me look withdrawn and statesmanlike in the process.

Like Invicta? Fine. Buy 'em by the hundreds? OK. Believe every claim ever made about them? Nobody cares. Most feared watch company, massive global presence? Whatever. Think their designs are unique and desirable? Well, that one's valid.

Not everybody is going to agree with you. Heck, you might even find yourself in a distinct minority but your opinions remain valid - except for your opinions on George, Mike and the Mods - those opinions you can post at the Internet Archive over the decayed, corrupt remains of WG.

One of the best posts I've read in years and not because of defending me. Just an immaculate summation of years of this stuff from the forum battles and wars. A take down worthy of a bow down as that was kingly.
 
As long as Cake is being served...Why the Hell Not?:dance:

900_7500761Enh_the-watch-man.jpg

250425_10150646181500010_623860009_18854824_1594380_n.jpg
<<Damon?:think:
 
My Seabase rocks you mofo's! [but I hate "Z" movements]. :happy:
 
I guess my watch must have committed suicide LOL. I blame the shame of all the shady business practices on this event. only a joke I just picked this up at a pawn shop for $40 I'm going to put the hand back on scrub the crystal out.
0bb8889f6c70fdddcb402e072a4058f3.jpg
ec22d0365b06b220e10f6b261355f1d4.jpg


Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
Something must be really wrong with me because today, as I type this, I'm wearing my Invicta Ocean Reef and I'm really enjoying it. I'm enjoying a watch made by a company that sucks. I guess that means that I suck too since I'm guilty of suckage by association.

I'll admit it. I'm happy with my purchase so I'm happy to admit that I suck. I sleep quite well at night knowing and accepting that fact! :lol:

Resume as you were.
 
Something must be really wrong with me because today, as I type this, I'm wearing my Invicta Ocean Reef and I'm really enjoying it. I'm enjoying a watch made by a company that sucks. I guess that means that I suck too since I'm guilty of suckage by association. and for the record your ocean reef is a nice watch. it's just that sometimes we need to look in the parking lot and check for a souped-up Nissan LOL.

I'll admit it. I'm happy with my purchase so I'm happy to admit that I suck. I sleep quite well at night knowing and accepting that fact! :lol:

Resume as you were.

That's the whole thing it's all pretty tongue-in-cheek. Most of us buy them and enjoy them . I just think anyone has the right to call out questionable business practices out-and-out lies about their Heritage and everything of the sort. I don't think any of us here said the watches out-and-out suck and they're terrible and don't buy them we just don't treat this watch company like some kind of demigod. it's just that sometimes we need to check the parking lot for souped-up Nissan LOL.
 
That's the whole thing it's all pretty tongue-in-cheek. Most of us buy them and enjoy them . I just think anyone has the right to call out questionable business practices out-and-out lies about their Heritage and everything of the sort. I don't think any of us here said the watches out-and-out suck and they're terrible and don't buy them we just don't treat this watch company like some kind of demigod. it's just that sometimes we need to check the parking lot for souped-up Nissan LOL.

Exactly BD. I could take a look back and attest to the money I spent on many models. If I could take a mulligan, my collection would look much different today knowing what I know now about the "questionable business practices out-and-out lies". It has nothing to do with a brand or watch sucking. That was the title of the video. Looking back I should have been gentler and changed the title to something like Invicta cons and more cons. :nail:

f2xNIQ.jpg
MAfmm9.jpg
blndJ6.jpg
gX0Ov3.jpg
tHCdr3.jpg
hd5q5S.jpg
ITbZze.jpg
 
Something must be really wrong with me because today, as I type this, I'm wearing my Invicta Ocean Reef and I'm really enjoying it. I'm enjoying a watch made by a company that sucks. I guess that means that I suck too since I'm guilty of suckage by association.

I'll admit it. I'm happy with my purchase so I'm happy to admit that I suck. I sleep quite well at night knowing and accepting that fact! :lol:

Resume as you were.

tenor.gif
 
Look at it this way a lot of musical artists that we listen to are just absolutely turds of human beings a watch company can be the same thing we still enjoy them but they are shady.
 
Back
Top Bottom