I don't want to speak for Bob... Bob tell me if I'm wrong. But I think he's just alluding to the selective outrage some collector's have towards some companies which is why he mentions Disney. There has been quite a bit of outrage from this group overall that Invicta has teamed with Disney (which ends up enveloping Lucas Arts, Marvel, etc) Whereas there doesn't seem to be much noise with other companies and their arrangements. Of which of course, there are many. Specific teams, players, actors, leagues, etc.
Invicta isn't the only company that falls prey to this but naturally like anything that has to do with Invicta the complaints are always the loudest.
From a business perspective, like it or not these deals are usually no-brainers for profit margins on both sides. Whether we're talking about Invicta and Disney, Tissot and the NBA, Rolex and Wimbledon, Citizen and Eli Manning and on and on and on. (well after this season, I"m not sure Eli will be getting much anymore.)