Kinda ironic to call a 20 second loss as 'accuracy' lol. Oughta call it what it really is 'inaccuracy'.
I agree that the stats are not bad, and we can adjust too. But I just think that it would be better named as to how inaccurate it is as we are dealing with an error or fault in 'perfect'. If you saw what an artery looks like after an angioplasty without a stent, you might be horrified, lol, because when they heal weeks after, they look much better. It's acceptable, but we wouldn't call it looking 'perfect' by any means. In fact, we call it a residual 'defect' or 'abnormality'. It's just a matter of how you look at vocabulary. If it ain't perfect, that it's inaccurate, but buyers need that warm fuzzy feeling, so they call it accuracy instead of inaccuracy, which it really is. [half empty vs half full to some I suppose].I'll disagree here. A day has 86400s. Assuming a 40s error/day, this works out to an error of 1s every 2160s. Less than a 1s error every half hour.
/Begin JZ voice
And this is for a mechanical automatic movement - powered by gears with no electronic components whatsoever.
The amount of engineering it takes to achieve this is insane
/end JZ voice
And I gather the NH35 is a robust movement in the sense that it can run for like a decade without any servicing?
Absolutely ridiculous for the movement price
Just like a "pre-owned" vs a "used" car.I agree that the stats are not bad, and we can adjust too. But I just think that it would be better named as to how inaccurate it is as we are dealing with an error or fault in 'perfect'. If you saw what an artery looks like after an angioplasty without a stent, you might be horrified, lol, because when they heal weeks after, they look much better. It's acceptable, but we wouldn't call it looking 'perfect' by any means. In fact, we call it a residual 'defect' or 'abnormality'. It's just a matter of how you look at vocabulary. If it ain't perfect, that it's inaccurate, but buyers need that warm fuzzy feeling, so they call it accuracy instead of inaccuracy, which it really is. [half empty vs half full to some I suppose].
Exactly. It's just semantics. It's a matter of your personal definition or choice. A 'near hit' is actually a 'miss'.Just like a "pre-owned" vs a "used" car.
I’m losing about 6 seconds so I’m doing good. My Regeneron is about 5 seconds fast a day. I dont worry. I just correct them every few days.Yep, I'm losing around 15 to 16 seconds each day too.
test it with the dial facing down for a day.I lose 21s/day with watch on desk. So I got the least accurate watch on this forum?
Modern Mechanical non-COSC Certified watch | ||
---|---|---|
Worst Case Scenario | +/-10 seconds per day | 99.988% accuracy |
Typical | +/-5 seconds per day | 99.994% accuracy |
Excellent | +/-3 seconds per day | 99.996% accuracy |
Modern Mechanical COSC Certified watch | ||
---|---|---|
Worst Case Scenario | +6/-4 seconds per day | 99.994% accuracy |
Typical | +/-3 seconds per day | 99.996% accuracy |
Excellent | +/-1 seconds per day | 99.998% accuracy |
If it is USPS you can sign up for informed delivery and enter an electronic signature then it will be left even if you are not there to sign.Should be here tomorrow. If I'm here to sign for it. I always forget Aragon ships signature required and I'm never hear when it arrives.