- Joined
- Jul 11, 2014
- Messages
- 15,608
Double ditto! But it is a setup since mike knows I love blue dials.At the right price I’d take that in a heartbeat. Exactly the way it is.
Wait, can mine say Moderator? (just kidding)
Double ditto! But it is a setup since mike knows I love blue dials.At the right price I’d take that in a heartbeat. Exactly the way it is.
At the right price I’d take that in a heartbeat. Exactly the way it is.
At the right price & a min 47mm choice, I'll change my vote...BOOM! I'm in.
And there is the problem. For me, 44mm max. Obviously this idea is impossible.
Agreed Lee. I would like to see WatchinTyme, instead of WiT, but would take what I could get, no matter the size or design.
Not Bad:
^^^ Forget the size...I'm IN!!!!
That's what I was thinking too. That's why we need "WatchinTyme Moderator" engraved on the back.Hate to agree to disagree Bill, but if the watch is going to be say 42mm the word WatchinTyme isn't going to be very legible to most of the WIT's who have aging eyes. At the very best IMHO, I think WIT is just fine with the Logo @ the top.
As it is in the above example I can barely read the line below automatic and that's in a pic that's blown up
Glad to see this is still alive... apologize to anyone who was offended by my comments... had a few and that beirng said...That's what I was thinking too. That's why we need "WatchinTyme Moderator" engraved on the back.
The no's are gaining ground so we'd need all the no's plus more to make this doable!Craig Hester posted a couple years ago, that it would take around 100 buyers to get such a watch project done. Even if he was off by 50%, the WiT watch project isn't even close. So I don't think it's worth discussion. In any event, it's definitely not worth fighting or arguing. That's just my 2 cents.